Una historia de los antiguos manuscritos
Un saludo a nuestros lectores
Nuestras editoras Virgi y Marga nos preparán un delicioso texto sobre la virilidad fatal y cuando el marido se convierte en un soberano estorbo.
Saludos desde la redacción.
Comunidad prostibular, en donde el amor, no es más que el vil pretexto para ejercer los derechos materiales y simbólicos del cuerpo.
Un saludo a nuestros lectores
Nuestras editoras Virgi y Marga nos preparán un delicioso texto sobre la virilidad fatal y cuando el marido se convierte en un soberano estorbo.
Piden a AMLO derogar la Ley de Cultura Cívica
Fin a extorsiones y golpes de la policía demandan sexoservidoras del DF
* Reclaman su derecho a trabajar sin ser víctimas de violencia
* Proponen retomar los convenios de tolerancia con los vecinos
Nora Sandoval
“No somos una minoría y estamos dispuestas a llegar hasta las últimas consecuencias; no pedimos nada más que lo que nos corresponde por derecho: trabajar sin ser extorsionadas, golpeadas, maltratadas o apañadas, porque no estamos cometiendo un delito”, dice Yesica, trabajadora sexual y participante activa del movimiento de sexoservidoras que busca el derogamiento de la Ley de Cultura Cívica (LCC), vigente en el Distrito Federal desde el primer día de agosto, y que a la fecha ha derivado en una violencia inusitada contra mujeres (y hombres) dedicadas a esta actividad, en que sean multadas e incluso sean recluidas por varias horas.
“Pongámonos de acuerdo; regresemos a los convenios con vecinos y trabajadoras con respecto al horario de trabajo, las condiciones para estar en la vía pública, y definamos calles específicas. Hagamos puntos de tolerancia y cuando alguien cometa un delito o infracción, que se aplique la ley, pero que no nos extorsionen ni golpeen. Ninguna compañera está aquí por gusto, ninguna; estamos por necesidad. Hay quienes vivimos en hoteles; hay amas de casa con hijos en la escuela”, afirma esta mujer de 34 años, con más de 10 en el oficio.
“No tenemos nada, seguimos en la lucha y en el movimiento; palabras son sólo palabras”, expresa Yesica, después de reunirse, junto con un grupo de sus compañeras trabajadoras sexuales, con el jefe del gobierno capitalino, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), al que le pidieron derogar la Ley de Cultura Cívica, a lo que él se negó, pero se comprometió a dar una “solución integral” al trabajo sexual.
Las sexoservidoras le presentaron a AMLO un documento en el que le plantean, además, otras nueve demandas básicas, entre las que destacan: un albergue para sexoservidoras adultas mayores, en el edificio del Curato de la Iglesia de La Soledad, que está vacío actualmente; la apertura de un centro de atención médica, jurídica y psicológica, en el que haya también talleres de capacitación en diversas áreas; un programa de vivienda en el que se les considere; apoyo a madres solteras; programas de salud por zona, y becas para sus hijos.
Con el comienzo del año la violencia contra las trabajadoras del sexo se recrudeció mediante operativos realizados con camionetas pánel , con 8 o 10 patrullas, así como con uniformados y policías de civil caminando por las calles de las zonas donde trabajan estas mujeres y hombres: las áreas aledañas a los metros Hidalgo, Revolución y Tacuba, La Merced, las calles de Guatemala y Loreto, en el centro; la Plaza de San Fernando, así como la delegación Iztapalapa, denuncian representantes de las sexoservidoras.
Ahora, la LCC considera como falta administrativa ejercer o invitar a la prostitución, y la sanciona con entre13 y 36 horas de arresto, además de una multa de entre 11 y 20 días de salario mínimo. Todo esto siempre y cuando exista queja vecinal. Sin embargo, “a veces nos imponen la primera vez 13 horas y nos cobran 678 pesos, que supuestamente es el equivalente a 18 salarios mínimos, ya que éste lo fijan en 52 pesos. La segunda vez no hay derecho a pagar multa, y nos quedamos las 24 horas. Y a la tercera viene la fichada con huellas dactilares y fotografías”, advierte Carmen.
“En Iztapalapa nos exigen mil 200 pesos, cuando que a las que bien les va sacan en promedio 300 pesos diarios; pero de ahí muchas tienen que pagar el hotel en el que viven, que cobra cien pesos por día, más sus alimentos”, se queja Sonia.
“Son trabajadoras que no tienen madrota ni padrote, que estaban cobijadas por el desaparecido Centro Integral de Atención a Sexoservidoras (CAIS) (que apoyaba la Comisión de Derechos Humanos del DF) que empezaron a reconocerse e incorporarse a una vida diferente y se fortalecieron en el sentido de no dejarse extorsionar. Son mujeres y hombres que construyen su identidad fuera de las mafias de las madrotas”, explica Margarita García Arteaga, asesora jurídica de las trabajadoras sexuales independientes.
Las otras –continúa García Arteaga- siguen entregando su cuota diaria a quienes las explotan, y con la entrada en vigor de la Ley de Cultura Cívica, “ha habido operativos en contra de ellas en algunos lugares, pero no tan violentos; yo creo que porque dan dinero. En cambio con las independientes son a diario y en todo momento”.
Con la nueva ley, los golpes, los jaloneos, las amenazas y las extorsiones se recrudecieron: “entran a los hoteles por las compañeras y esto provoca situaciones violentas con los clientes. Hay algunas que se tienen que hacer amantes de los policías para que por lo menos les avisen cuando viene el operativo”, explica Carmen, que tiene a la zona de La Merced como su centro de trabajo.
Por si fuera poco, las quejas vecinales –argumento para levantarlas- son “un machote que llenan los mismos policías, con un nombre y un apellido sin domicilio, y una firma ilegible; o bien, a algunos formatos que ya tienen llenados les cambian la fecha con lápiz, les sacan una fotocopia y ya tienen el documento actualizado. Esas quejas no tiene ninguna legalidad porque no sabemos ni quiénes son porque no se nota el nombre, además de que no se establece quién está cometiendo la infracción”, asevera Margarita García.
La asesora de las trabajadoras sexuales agrega que algunos de los vecinos “son mafiosos, ya que piden servicio gratuito para que no presenten la queja vecinal. O se dan casos, como en la colonia Tabacalera, donde los mismos policías pasan a tocarle a los vecinos para que firmen, y con cuatro o cinco rúbricas ya es suficiente para ellos; además, el papel no es presentado en la delegación: Pero eso sí, empiezan a levantar gente”.
Dispuestas a negociar
Para frenar esta situación, las trabajadoras sexuales han emprendido acciones en varios frentes. Primero en lo jurídico, para ampararse contra la LCC. Manuel Fuentes, de la Asociación Nacional de Abogados Democráticos, asegura que la mencionada ley viola los artículos 123, 13, 14 y 16 de la Constitución. En el 123 se establece que es el Congreso de la Unión el que deberá expedir leyes sobre el trabajo, “de tal manera que la Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal no está facultada para reconocer y sancionar el trabajo sexual”.
Explica que el artículo 13 de la Carta Magna “prohíbe establecer leyes privativas para determinadas personas, y la LCC tiene estas características”. En tanto, el artículo 14 determina que nadie puede ser privado de sus derechos si no es mediante juicio ante tribunales previamente establecidos y de acuerdo con normas legales; es decir, “las trabajadoras sexuales no pueden ser recluidas sólo por el señalamiento de terceras personas, como está sucediendo, ya que no es posible verificar el dicho de los acusadores”, enfatiza Fuentes.
El artículo 16 de la Constitución indica, además, que “nadie puede ser molestado en su persona sino en virtud de mandamiento escrito de la autoridad competente, que funde y motive la causa legal del procedimiento”, explica el abogado.
Por otro lado, las trabajadoras sexuales presentaron ya una queja colectiva ante la Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Distrito Federal, esto pese a que ellas mismas reconocen que el titular del organismo, Emilio Álvarez de Icaza, sólo se ha manifestado en lo general en contra de la ley -particularmente en el caso de los franeleros, argumentando que la nueva legislación viola garantías individuales-, pero no lo ha hecho en el caso de las trabajadoras sexuales.
A todo esto, las trabajadores sexuales señalan en voz de Samanta: “habíamos avanzado cuando el CAIS funcionaba; habíamos hecho convenios con vecinos de casa habitación o de comercios para que permitieran el trabajo sexual, siempre y cuando nosotras cumpliéramos reglas como cierta vestimenta, horarios determinados y buen comportamiento. Si alguien de nosotras violentaba ese acuerdo, perdíamos el convenio. Eso funcionó muy bien”.
“Uno de los requisitos que se establecía en el reglamento es que no podíamos escandalizar, drogarnos, emborracharnos o cometer algún delito. Esa fue una posibilidad y una solución; los vecinos nos tenían identificadas y sabían qué podíamos hacer y qué no, y nunca violentábamos los convenios”, expresa Yesica, quien agrega que hoy quieren la vuelta a ese pasado, una negociación con la autoridad en la que desaparezcan los abusos y las dejen trabajar.
Queremos –piden- una posibilidad de estar de manera digna en la calle y buscar la salida a esto con la capacitación en talleres; queremos el reconocimiento social a nuestra condición de mujeres, con respeto, sin golpes, malos tratos o extorsión.
Jano Mendoza / Revista Deep / Abril del 2004.
In
January 1838, Mrs. Blanchard was arrested for keeping a common bawdy
house on the second storey of a house located on St. Paul Street. One
of the residents of the house, not associated with Blanchard’s
business, alleged that the floor separating the two levels was in
such a dilapidated state that he could hear the lewd practices of the
men and women who frequented the brothel! {1}
Nearby, at the corner of Bonsecours and St. Paul streets,
streetwalkers and drunken soldiers routinely rioted. During one
fracas, a prostitute was assaulted at the door step of a house,
belonging to a justice of the peace, which was discovered “saturated
with blood.” {2}
The suburbs were not exempt from similar mayhem. In the Recollets
suburb, police raided the brothel of Etienne Billet and his wife
Marie Mattée after receiving a complaint from three neighbours
that Billet and Mattée kept a disorderly house where they
received guests “de mauvaise vie et moeurs” at all
hours of the day and night. {3}
These
stories, all garnered from the court records of the Quarter Sessions
of the Peace, illustrate how prostitution was integrated into all of
the city’s neighbourhoods,
Until
recently, historians have not considered the relationship of
prostitution to public space and to the social geography of the
city. {6}
Rather, the concept ‘red-light’ district, an area known
to the public where prostitutes congregated, either seeking or being
sought out by clients, has been employed to signify segregated,
distinct area of the urban landscape, detached from the daily lives
of most of a city’s inhabitants. In earlier studies, historians
of prostitution tended to centre their research on the beginning
decades of the twentieth century and the reformers campaigns to
concentrate prostitution in red-light districts when it became
apparent to them that the eradication of the sex trade was out of the
question. As a consequence of this focus in the historiography, we
Although
Montreal prostitutes practised their trade throughout the urban
landscape, certain areas of the city were identified by the public as
red-light districts for their clusters of brothels and concentration
of street prostitutes. These districts were blended into urban
neighbourhoods, as the three examples at the beginning of this
discussion reveal. For instance, within the fortifications of the old
city where Montreal’s elite lived, a red-light district existed
around the Quebec Barracks near the waterfront. This district drew
prostitutes to this locality where they worked on the streets or out
of brothels, taverns, and other public buildings. {8}
This was similar to London, England, where Penelope Corfield
describes the streets as having become more differentiated in
function over the eighteenth-century. She argues that red-light
districts developed for the first time near streets that specialized
in various forms of entertainment and which lured crowds, expediting
meetings between prostitutes and their clients. {9}
This way of defining a red-light district works better than Timothy
Gilfoyle’s much stricter one. He argues that in New York City
before 1820, prostitution was a private affair; little streetwalking
took place outside informal, spatially defined areas of prostitution.
This “spatially defined areas of prostitution,” according
to Gilfoyle, did not mean red-light districts. It was only after 1850
he contends, that Soho, with 40% of the city’s prostitution,
became a new large-
In
Montreal, women moved easily among the various sites of prostitution.
Sometimes brothel prostitutes solicited in the streets bringing men
to the brothel where they worked or to houses of assignation. On
other occasions, street prostitutes sought out abandoned houses to
service soldiers, where they lingered until compelled to leave by the
authorities. Numerous street prostitutes searched for clients in
public spaces only to return to their lodgings with the men. Thus,
brothel and street prostitution were not always distinct operations.
Although brothel-keepers and street prostitutes did essentially the
same thing, sell sex for money, the criminal justice system treated
the two sites of prostitution very differently. For this reason, I
will examine the nature of the brothel and its association to the
city and streetwalking separately. Before taking a closer look at the
relationship of Montreal brothel-keepers and streetwalkers to the
urban landscape, I will focus briefly on the socio-economic context
in which the prostitutes worked.
In
this period, Montreal was a prominent commercial, manufacturing, and
administrative center which underwent significant transformation and
turmoil. Both the War of 1812 and the Rebellions of 1837-1838, in
themselves important political markers, drew greater numbers of
soldiers to the barracks, providing patrons for city’s brothels
and clients for street prostitutes. Major public work projects, like
the redevelopment of the port and the construction of the Lachine
Canal, upgraded the city’s infrastructure and conferred upon
Montreal an important transportation system which could ship to and
from markets further west. {11}
These projects also furnished city prostitutes with a clientele. The
decades of the 1820s and 1830s were characterized by social
dislocation in the countryside, the decline of the fur trade,
epidemics of cholera, and growing immigration of Irish, Scottish and
English people. {12}
These features had significant repercussions for many popular-class
Montrealers and new immigrants. Every day life was fraught with
In
the decades leading up to the industrial revolution, Montreal
experienced a transformation in its economic, social, and demographic
fabric. Between 1825 and 1844, the city’s population nearly
doubled. A third of Montreal’s inhabitants in 1825 was
comprised of immigrants and, by 1832, anglophones made up the
majority in the city {13} .
Its urban geography reflected this metamorphosis: Montreal spread
out past the demolished city walls into the quickly expanding
suburbs. {14}
By the early nineteenth century, two-thirds of the inhabitants lived
outside the old city fortifications in the suburbs where cheaper
housing could be procured. {15}
Women who had incorporated brothel-keeping into their household
economies essentially delivered sexual services to the clients who
lived in their neighbourhoods.
Montreal
women and men organized brothels in a variety of living arrangements
throughout the city, occupying entire dwellings, a part or a floor of
multi-family houses, taverns, cellars, and single rooms. The type of
housing they chose can tell us something about the class nature of
the brothels and their clientele. For instance, some women and men
operated houses of prostitution in more substantial buildings made of
stone like those on Craig Street, or along affluent St. Paul and
Notre Dame Streets. This contrasts sharply with the taverns or
tippling houses found along the waterfront in the same area that
catered to prostitutes, sailors, and soldiers. Occasionally women
kept brothels in abandoned houses, some described as uninhabitable.
Certain other establishments attracted a particular clientele as in
the “balolots et domestiques” who frequented one
brothel in St. Mary’s suburb {17}
or the unskilled Irish men who may have preferred the “cabanes
de planches” along the Lachine Canal. Those who provided
sexual services out of a single room obviously operated a rather
small enterprise. Similarly, some brothel-keepers rented
Court
depositions reveal that brothel-keepers operated their enterprises
over the entire urban landscape. Maps 1, 2, and 3 {19}
show the location of brothels {20}
over three periods: 1810-1829, 1830-1837, and 1838-1842. {21}
Since the site of these brothels was
These
maps also demonstrate that while madams set up their houses of
prostitution throughout the city, some concentrated them near public
areas of the city where people gathered, such as the markets,
military installations where large numbers of men were quartered, and
in particular zones: between Lagauchetière and Craig Streets
on the west side of St. Lawrence suburb and Chenneville and
Bonsecours Streets in the east; and in the Quebec suburbs from the
Quebec Barracks to Salaberry Street. Of the four major routes to the
countryside, St. Mary, St. Lawrence, St. Joseph, and St. Antoine, at
least two underwent a significant growth in the number of brothels
over the period. While setting up houses of prostitution close to
areas where men congregated or in quarters reputed to be red-light
districts made good business sense, maintaining brothels in city
neighbourhoods also brought sexual services closer to the
popular-class men who utilized them.
After
1830, Montrealers were more likely to protest the presence of houses
of ill repute in their midst by prosecuting the keepers of these
establishments, some of which had been operating in their
neighbourhoods for as long as ten years. Residents in certain areas
of the city made a concerted effort to “clean up their
neighbourhoods.” The notorious Vitré Street, located in
one of the city’s red-light districts, is a case in point.
Between 1830 and 1837, Montrealers complained about ten brothels on
Vitré Street and from 1838 to 1842 at least five complaints
were received. In one of these depositions, Etienne Benêche dit
Lavictoire objected to four houses of prostitution which were
accommodated in two wooden dwellings. {22}
In a raid that followed from his complaint, 37 men and women were
arrested in the five brothels: five madames, twenty prostitutes and
twelve clients. The brothels on Vitré Street were also the
subject of at least one grand jury
Not
all of the known brothels were raided by the police. Constables who
were cognizant of the location of brothels on their beats, walked
passed some of them without arresting the inhabitants. {27}
Sometimes constables conducted other police business in brothels
without closing the establishments. For instance, brothel-keeper
Marie Lamarche requested police assistance to quell a disturbance
that had taken place in her house of ill fame. {28}
The police departed without laying charges of keeping a disorderly
house against Lamarche and her inmates. Perhaps the most telling
example involved a young man who complained to police that while on
business at the popular Madame Lavictoire’s, he was assaulted
with a poker. He was told to make his complaint at the Police Office
in the morning and “to prevent accidents to keep better
company in future.” {29}
As long as brothel-keepers maintained a certain degree of decorum in
their establishments, then neighbours were less likely to complain
and police were more likely to tolerate them, since past experience
had revealed that the regulation of known brothels was a more
realistic goal than abolition.
Some
brothel-keepers kept businesses at the same addresses for years until
something happened which prompted neighbours to seek legal recourse.
It could have been a particular incident that led to a complaint or
an effort to rid their neighbourhoods of all remnants of
prostitution. Their efforts were not always successful. A few
brothel-
As
brothel-keepers relocated within the city and brothel prostitutes
moved from one establishment to another, the sex trade as a whole
continued to center around certain streets. We have no way of knowing
however, if the same buildings were employed. In New York City, for
instance, while madams may have relocated their businesses, changing
addresses did not disrupt the city’s sex trade since the same
quarters continued to lodge brothels. {31}
The
territory around specific military installations was a popular site
to operate houses of prostitution. Montrealers established brothels
on streets near the Quebec Barracks, like St. Paul Street where one
widow of a soldier rented a room in a house to service men from the
barracks, {32}
or on Dubord Street where pedlar Mary Martin, kept a house of ill
repute to entertain a similar clientele. {33}
The Quebec Barracks quartered a large number of single men who liked
to drink and have sex, both of which prostitutes provided. {34}
Similarly, some city tavernkeepers and innkeepers also catered to the
military crowd by keeping women of ill fame in their establishments
to dispense sexual services to
Several brothel-keepers disguised their businesses as boardinghouses
as in the case of one man who kept a disorderly house on St. Mary
Street which served both the civilian and military populations. {37}
One of the boarders, complained that men and women “resort
there for the purpose of drinking and indulging in vice and
dissipation.” {38}
Similarly, houses of assignation, taverns, hotels, and lodging houses
served as brothels in antebellum Philadelphia. Women solicited in
theatres and taverns then brought their customers to rooms in some of
these establishments. {39}
It
was not only the activities of a particular house that annoyed the
neighbours, but the bedlam that spilled out into the streets. One man
protested that the lives of passersby were endangered in front of one
brothel by the ill treatment of men who frequented the house. Only a
few nights previously, he had been assaulted and robbed. {40}
Another neighbour complained that he lived so close to a brothel
where large numbers of young men gathered, that one night some of
these youths forcefully tried to enter his home. {41}
Prostitutes from particular brothels solicited men immediately
outside their establishments, calling out to passersby to enter. One
pedestrian, James Gainer, complained of being accosted by women
coming out of a brothel in his neighbourhood, having been
‘indecently’ propositioned by two women. {42}
Neighbours also complained about soldiers discharging their weapons
while frequenting known brothels.
Many
neighbours seemed to tolerate the presence of brothels if they were
quiet or until some incident occurred to raise their ire. For
example, George Mackin abided the proximity of a neighbourhood
brothel until he got into an altercation with one of her prostitutes.
One Saturday afternoon in August, an acquaintance of Mr. Mackin was
rudely insulted by one of the brothel inmates who made some reference
to this acquaintance and the deponent’s wife. Irritated by the
language, Mr. Mackin struck the “notorious harlot” across
the cheek. The following evening she threw stones at his house and
We
know little about the life of prostitutes within the brothel walls.
Lower court records do not lend themselves very easily to
descriptions about the physical environment, the brothel culture and
practices, sex, and payment. However, we are at times permitted
glimpses into the interiors of some brothels. Moreover, when John
McCord was a justice of the peace in the Court of Quarter Sessions,
from 1846 to 1853, he kept personal accounts of the cases he heard.
Although he served after the period under study, his descriptions are
extremely useful. These documents reveal the very public nature of
brothel life. For instance, to the perplexity of neighbours, some of
the men and women who frequented city brothels walked about the
brothel and back yard partially or completely nude. One of Josephine
Mainville’s neighbours accused her of indecent exposure; he
claimed that she was “always naked in the upper part of person”
whenever he saw her in her yard. {46}
Brothel
prostitutes offered sexual services in an assortment of different
ways: two sex trade workers spent the night together with client John
Sparling. {47}
Sometimes a prostitute worked with a single client in the seclusion
of a private bedroom, other times less privately. One client
attempted to have sex with Jane Dunn in full view of the household
and on the kitchen floor surrounded by three inmates, three policemen
and the madam of the brothel who held a candle. Being too drunk, Dunn
and the man were unable to succeed. {48}
Although
we know little about how solicitation took place within the brothel,
one madam accused a “gentleman” of approaching her in her
house on St. Constant Street
Brothel-keepers
offered a variety of entertainment in their enterprises from
gambling, as in the case of John Trimble’s disorderly house
where soldiers and civilians amused themselves “at playing
cards and knocking on the table,” an early form of gin rummy,
to drinking and dancing. Court records reveal that dancing was
popular recreation in some brothels. Music and dancing were customary
forms of amusement at Pierre Lafrance’s house of ill fame. {52}
Another couple held bi-weekly balls at their “maison de
débauche” located on Bleury Street attended by
“filles de joies” and young men. {53}
In Halifax, brothels offered a variety of services such as dancing
and entertainment, providing food and drink, retail selling of
ready-made clothing or groceries or service shops offering barbering
or pawnbroking. {54}
Certainly brothel-keepers were astute in initiating a number of ways
to attract clients and increase revenue.
Alcohol
consumption played a significant role in the workplace of
prostitution. Numerous depositions describe Montreal’s brothels
as establishments where illicit “carnal connexion” and
drinking took place. Soldiers and “filles prostituées”
passed their time in Alexandre Vallée’s brothel,
drinking and ‘whoring.’ {55}
Sometimes clients conveyed their own beverages as in the case of
civilians and soldiers who brought “bottles of liquor” to
Catherine Jordan and Margaret Chisholm’s brothel. {56}
Usually men purchased alcoholic refreshments at the brothel. As a
lucrative source of income, {57}
brothel-keepers sold liquor
Another
characteristic of some of the Montreal brothels was the violence that
erupted within the brothel walls between a number of different
people: between madams and the prostitutes, between men and the
prostitutes, and between the patrons. One prostitute accused a
brothel-keeper and two clients of cruelly beating, scratching,
bruising, and ill treating her while in the establishment. {60}
Occasionally physical assaults ended in the death of a prostitute.
Three years before the beginning of this study, a pregnant prostitute
was murdered in John Griswold’s brothel after being assaulted
and punched during a brawl. Griswold had a reputation for the melees
that occurred with regularity in his disorderly house, which was
described as a “très mauvaise maison.” {61}
Brothel-keepers
also endured the violence of patrons. On two separate occasions in
1838, madam Euphrosine Auger accused clients of assault and battery.
In one instance,
Brothel-keepers also accused men of assembling at their residences
to commit riots. Ellen Labrie denounced six men for rioting and
assault with intent to murder at her disorderly house. {64}
Brothel-keeper Lucie Lenoir dite Rolland reported to the police that
her residence had been assailed with stones thrown by four men,
resulting in broken windows. Furthermore, Rolland maintained that one
of the culprits had been disturbing the peace at her house on a daily
basis, and had struck her on at least one occasion. She implored that
these men give security to keep the peace. {65}
That brothels could be dangerous places to live and work is
demonstrated by these few examples. The opportunity to make brothels
safer by hiring men to protect the inmates and by leasing better
buildings served to reduced the risk. For Montreal streetwalkers,
survival could be more tenuous.
Life
for prostitutes on the Montreal streets was difficult and dangerous.
Streetwalkers, especially those who were homeless, had to contend
with violence, hunger and cold. In late fall 1832, Ellen McGuire, “a
prostitute of the lowest grade,” was discovered dead, lying
nearly nude in an abandoned government building adjoining the
Commissariat forage yard, across from the Quebec Barracks. Two of her
colleagues were located alive, resting in a cart in the street
without any covering and wearing few clothes. {67}
In February 1842, Mary Beers, a “woman of ill fame,” {68}
was found by Constable Adams, frozen to death in a canal boat. Having
no home to return to after her discharged from the Common Gaol just
two days previously, Beers had been “compelled to find shelter
for
Homeless
prostitutes sought out certain areas around the city where they could
find food and lodging. For instance, the prolific orchards and
farmers’ fields furnished prostitutes with shelter and food.
They were sometimes accused of picking apples, milking cows, and
pillaging gardens. One farmer complained to the police that soldiers
and “improper girls” habitually broke into his orchard,
where they stole apples and damaged his fruit trees. {71}
Prostitutes also sought shelter in a number of different places, such
as abandoned buildings, barns, stables, and haylofts.
Like
their brothel counterparts, streetwalkers also had to contend with
violence. In 1832, prostitute Amable Breton accused a man of
attacking her while she attended high mass. Apparently he “l’aurait
saisi par les cheveux et l’aurait frappée à coups
de pieds et de poings et aurait dechiré ses hardes.” {72}
When constable Pierre Poitras investigated a complaint about a
disturbance of the peace in the St. Laurence suburb, he discovered a
crowd of people gathered around a prostitute who had been violently
beaten by two men after they apparently caught her in the act of
stealing from one of them. {73}
The violence encountered by Montreal prostitutes was not unique.
Susan Harsin found that Parisian street prostitutes were often
victims of violence. She argues that their vulnerability to brutality
was associated with the type of work that they did, which brought
them in contact with criminals, the dangerous streets that they
frequented late at night, and the notoriety associated with their
trade. {74}
Certain
other conditions contributed to the dangers of the streets. At night
most of the roadways in the city were dark; lights were added to some
of them in 1815 at the
Some
of the lanes and alleys leading off St. Paul Street were so narrow
that pedestrians had to shrink up against the walls of buildings to
avoid contact with any horse and cart passing by. {77}
City officials neglected many of the city’s streets, allowing
them to become rundown. Commissioners Street, a potentially agreeable
promenade, was “covered with heaps of rubbish, stagnant pools,
and deep ruts, and in some places half covered with logs of timber.” {78}
In rainy weather, unpaved city streets became very muddy. {79}
Sherbrooke Street for instance was only passable in day light, during
the spring and fall rainy season, when pedestrians could see where to
step. {80}
In the winter, Montreal streets could contain ice as much as two to
three feet thick. {81}
In 1820, plans to reduce the amount of sand on the city streets
during the winter months provoked criticism in an editorial in the
Montreal Herald which suggested this would render both the
streets and sidewalks dangerous. {82}
Maps
4, 5, and 6 show the location of arrests of some street prostitutes.
Since the precise location where streetwalkers were arrested was
seldom recorded, at the very least, the maps demonstrate their
pattern of movement over the three periods. The old city remained an
important area for street prostitution, especially where large
numbers of men congregated such as the old and new markets, the Champ
de Mars, and the Quebec Barracks. For instance, in 1836 a Grand Jury
complained that respectable Montrealers were prevented from utilizing
the Champ de Mars as a promenade because it was infested by “filles
publiques” who committed “scènes
dégoutantes” at night. {83}
Another favourite spot
Streetwalkers
solicited or were sought out by clients by asking for or by offering
to buy them a drink. Like the brothel, alcohol consumption played a
crucial role in street prostitution. A small window into the street
culture of prostitution was provided by the Montreal Herald in
its reporting of a larceny case involving the theft of a watch and
chain. During the September session of the Court of Kings Bench, John
West testified that in May 1826 on his way back from the St. Lawrence
suburb where he had picked up a pair of shoes for his master, “he
fell in” with Marguerite Miron. Miron requested that he “treat
her with some drink.” West obliged. On returning to his
employer’s house, the door was locked; not wanting to disturb
the family, he went to an out-house to sleep. Shortly thereafter,
Miron and a man approached him, asking for more liquor. Since he had
none, nor did he have any money, West suggested that she search his
body to verify what he had told her. Not long after they left he
noticed that his silver watch was missing. On cross-examination, West
denied that he had offered Miron a drink but admitted that he knew
her “by her walk.” He also denied that he asked her to
sleep with him, arguing he had had no “connexion” with
her, and denied that he gave her his watch in pledge for money. The
jury did not believe his story and found Miron not guilty. {86}
Solicitation
of clients took many different forms, from the conspicuous in which a
streetwalker exposed herself or openly pursued men, to more covert
forms which involved particular symbols or coded behaviour. A woman
might be identified as a prostitute by frequenting certain city
streets at night, by her manner of gait as in the case of Marguerite
Miron, or by wearing particular clothing in a distinctive way. One
prostitute was apprehended when she “shamelessly and indecently
exposed her nakedness in the public street to all the people
passing.” {87}
Perhaps the red shawl and a plume of black feathers worn by
streetwalker Catherine Ryan while promenading at eight o’clock
one evening near the Bonsecours Church served as a sign of her work. {88}
While I have no evidence that streetwalkers followed a particular
dress code, prostitutes in Victorian England did so as a way to
overtly reveal their occupation to men. Judith Walkowitz described
streetwalkers as “bonnetless, without shawls, they presented
themselves ‘in their figure’ to passersby.” {89}
Some
women were accused of being loose, idle and disorderly for purely
subjective or circumstantial reasons. By the 1840s, Montreal women
walking alone at night on particular streets risked their reputation
and safety. Barbara Hobson contends that in some American cities, the
presence of women on certain streets became a way to
Prostitutes
often solicited clients in city taverns. Chief Constable Fitzpatrick
accused one tavernkeeper of allowing soldiers and common prostitutes
to drink in his tavern in St. Mary Street and to assemble outside of
his door and “shew [sic] the most disgraceful conduct on the
public street.” {93}
Another tavernkeeper, who kept a pub on Commissioners Street,
permitted prostitutes and soldiers to drink and gather there,
moreover, allowing them to “sit and drink in his barr [sic]
room exhibiting a public scandale.” {94}
In the first half of nineteenth century Horncastle, B.J. Davey found
that some pub-keepers openly encouraged prostitutes to use their
facilities. {95}
Disreputable
characters reputedly frequented certain areas of the city. Notorious
taverns located around the wharves in the old city served as a
meeting place for soldiers, prostitutes, and others. {96}
Licenced tavern keepers, concerned about the rioting, drunkenness,
and types of characters admitted to these places, formed an
association to suppress these establishments. {97}
Capital Street was considered such a notorious area that it became
the subject of a petition presented to the House of Assembly in 1816.
Petitioners demanded that the taverns be closed along with part of
the street itself. {98}
Since alcohol consumption played such a major role in solicitation,
some Montreal prostitutes who spend long periods in drinking
establishments became alcohol
Following
the Rebellions, the growth of the city’s police force coincided
with a concerted effort to clean up certain parts of the city. Police
arrested more and more street prostitutes which was a direct attack
upon vagrancy in Montreal. In New York City too, middle-class
citizens organized new charities to reform and relieve the poor,
motivated partially by their attack upon the way that propertyless
New Yorkers used public space which was in direct opposition to what
the middle-class wanted. For the urban middle-class, “ordered
streets,” free of prostitution, maintained their personal
safety and enhanced the convenience and value of their private
property. The urban poor, in contrast, sought to eke out a living or
at the very least to supplement an inadequate one on the streets.
This realm provided an economy without rents and with spontaneous
encounters. {102}
Street prostitutes depended upon access to streets and to other
public spaces in order to subsist.
Montreal
prostitutes travelled in the streets and in green spaces in and
around the city. As we have already seen, the fields and orchards
were popular places for streetwalkers to congregate and meet men. {103}
One such place was the Priest’s Farm, the property of the
Seminary of the Sulpicians, which consisted of many buildings,
gardens, and orchards. {104}
The police made occasional raids to round up these women. In one
instance, following complaints that soldiers and women of loose
character had broken into Mr. Brechenridge’s garden and orchard
located at the end of St. Joseph Street, the officer on duty
proceeded there to arrest the women. On arrival, he discovered three
well known prostitutes and approximately thirty soldiers. He refused
to arrest the women
While
we do not know the circumstances which resulted in the rendezvous of
three prostitutes and thirty soldiers, the ratio of women to men at
Brechenridge’s garden begs several questions. Would it have
been a bonanza in remuneration for these three women to service
thirty soldiers, despite the hard work that such a venture would
entail? Or would it have been considered by them as a potentially
dangerous predicament which required particular skill and tact to
prevent harm to themselves?
Like their brothel counterparts, streetwalkers often consorted with
soldiers. Prostitutes might frequent military buildings, as in the
case of Louise Dandelin who patronized the military stables near the
St. Antoine suburb, {107}
or areas of the city where soldiers worked. Another prostitute made a
habit of passing nights close to the “corps de garde”
where, in watchman Antoine Caspel’s opinion, she seemed
“chercher à débaucher les soldats.” {108}
Moreover, prostitutes usually solicited and serviced soldiers in the
public spaces of the city. John Daly, a soldier in the artillery and
Catherine Brodeur were arrested after committing “une
offense contre les moeurs dans la rue près du marché
Ste. Anne.” {109}
What effect did the presence of gangs of armed soldiers have on the
gender politics of public space? What consequence did this have on
policing and for the women involved with soldiers? Any restriction
to the streetwalkers’ access to the public had certain
consequences. The public streets served as an obvious venue for the
women to eke out a living. It was also in the streets, as Christine
Stansell’s study of New York popular-class women shows, where
women performed domestic duties such as “pinching and saving,
of cleaning and borrowing and lending, of taking – and of being
taken,” {110}
where they helped each other, raised their children, and voiced their
pleasures and grievances. {111}
Thus, the separation between private and public spheres was not part
of the everyday experience of women in early nineteenth-century
Montreal. The police registers provide a small window of opportunity
to examine these questions. While we do not
The
relationship prostitutes established with soldiers was complex.
Prostitutes depended upon soldiers as an important source of
remuneration in a job which they knew was potentially fraught with
danger. They could reduce the peril by soliciting in groups and by
cultivating relationships with these military men. It is obvious from
court documents and police records that Montreal streetwalkers
implemented these strategies. Some prostitutes helped soldiers who
wanted to desert. Mary Marois was fined £20 in 1810 for
concealing and assisting a deserter from the 41st Regiment. {116}
Paradoxically, they were also dependent upon soldiers to protect them
from the physical abuse of other men, from arrest, and from
Montreal’s harsh climate by providing food, shelter, and
Street
prostitutes were arrested and incarcerated for any number of reasons.
The sexual services that they provided to men had a very public face.
At least three women were caught in “flagrant delit,”
one on the beach, another under a street light, and a third one on a
bench in the market place. Ann Taylor was discovered by a watchman at
midnight sleeping on a bench in the New Market after having
“forniquer (sic) avec un soldat.” {121}
Others solicited and serviced clients in groups. Adelaide St. André,
Henriette Hamelle, and Peggy Dollar were incarcerated for committing
on Papineau Road what Charles Picard described as “en plein
jour les derniers actes d’indécences avec des hommes.” {122}
For other homeless streetwalkers like Elizabeth Austin and Elmire
Perrault, they preferred a more private setting. Accompanied by two
soldiers, Austin and Perrault broke into a house on St. Catherine
Street by forcing open a shutter. {123}
Prostitutes also brought clients to their lodgings. Adélaide
Menard who leased a room in a house on St. Paul Street, admitted men
into her apartment through a window. {124}
This situation seems similar to eighteenth-century England, where not
only did prostitutes bring clients to brothels and
Streetwalkers
could also be arrested for committing offences such as loitering in
the streets, begging, disturbing the peace, keeping company with
other people of ill fame, throwing stones, drunkenness, and being
homeless during inclement weather. Two streetwalkers were arrested in
November 1835 when they were discovered sleeping in a hayloft. {127}
Some of the women were apprehended as vagrants when they settled
their differences publicly. Prostitutes Margaret McGinnis and
Margaret Carr were arrested after being discovered in a field behind
the Champ de Mars, in a drunken state and “in the act of
fighting together.” {128}
Similarly, Haligonian prostitutes were arrested for any number of
infractions such as drunkenness, blasphemy, larceny, and assault and
battery. {129}
By the end of the period under study, many Montreal women were
arrested simply for wandering in the fields and loitering in the city
streets.
Prostitution
flourished throughout the Montreal urban landscape. Streetwalkers
exercised their trade in the old city as well as the suburbs, in
fields, and on roadways around the city. Brothel-keepers set up
houses of ill fame in the old city and in the suburbs, Côte à
Barron, and Pointe à Callière, spreading out to the far
reaches of some of the suburbs. Streetwalkers were arrested in ever
greater numbers by constables who expanded the area where they
patrolled, to include the streets of the suburbs and the green spaces
in and around town.
While
Montrealers shared urban space with brothel-keepers and their
inmates, neighbours complained about houses of prostitution if they
wanted to rid their quarter of the sex trade or whenever inmates of
these establishments broke with the prevailing code of conduct.
Prostitutes and their clients made too much noise, offended their
neighbours in a variety of different ways, or threatened the safety
of the neighbourhood. The permeability of households with public
spaces and the intimate nature of neighbourhoods encouraged close
contact with neighbours and a variety of relationships with each
other. Thus, offenders could be disciplined or banished from their
neighbourhoods.
Streetwalkers
lived large parts of their lives in the public streets of the city.
Many of them had to eke out a living in the harshest of environments,
where daily survival was dependent upon finding lodging and food. The
streets could also be a place for them to die. Alliances with men,
many of whom were soldiers, were forged to facilitate making a living
and to establish companionship.
1.
Archives nationales du Québec – Montréal
(hereafter ANQM), TL32 S1 SS1, Quarter Sessions documents (hereafter
QSD), 15-1-1838.
4.
This mixture of land use, from the presence of brothels in
residential areas to the very public nature of prostitution in their
streets had important implications for community relations. Bill
Bramwell who has examined the relationship between the use of public
space and the community in nineteenth-century Birmingham, argues
that local communities were made and reshaped by people in conflict
as well as by what people held in common. Both conferred a localized
geographical coherence upon the neighbourhoods. Bramwell, “Public
space and local communities: the example of Birmingham, 1840-1880”
in Gerry Kearns & Charles W.J. Withers (eds.), Urbanising
Britain: Essays on class and community in the nineteenth century
(New York, 1992), 32-39.
6.
I wish to thank Tamara Myers for sharing some of her ideas on the
gendered use of public space, especially in relationship to street
prostitution and red-light districts. Myers, Criminal Women and
Bad Girls: Regulation and Punishment in Montreal, 1890-1930
(Ph.D., McGill University, 1996).
7.
Early nineteenth-century American cities were characterized by their
amorphous nature, with unlimited accessibility to both women and
men. The beginnings of gender differentiation emerged between 1825
and 1840 with the development of so-called male space in the form of
public halls, theatres, and merchant exchanges. By mid-century,
class became the means to differentiate public space. Virtuous
middle to upper-class women, to prevent an affront to their
sensibilities by encounters with so-called “dangerous”
women, limited their public space to “safe” areas.
Working-class women on the other hand continued to share public
space with prostitutes. Mary P. Ryan, Women in Public: Between
Banners and Ballots, 1825-1880 (Baltimore, 1990), 64-79. Both
Timothy Gilfoyle and Marilynn Wood Hill contend that the integration
of prostitution in the neighbourhoods of all social classes did not
occur until 1820. This wide spread dispersal of the sex trade was
short lived according to Gilfoyle, culminating in the development of
Soho as a red-light district. Gilfoyle, “The Urban Geography
of Commercial Sex: Prostitution in New York City, 1790-1860,”
Journal of Urban History 13:4 (August 1987), 383-384. Wood
Hill on the other hand suggests that despite the dispersal of
prostitution, certain areas of the city gained notoriety as centers
of prostitution. Wood Hill, Their Sisters’ Keepers:
Prostitution in New York City, 1830-1870 (New York, 1993), 184.
8.
Court depositions in 1798 show that this quarter of the city was a
popular area for Montreal prostitutes. Nine street-walkers were
named in a Grand Jury presentment, who were in “the daily
habit of frequenting the ramparts near the powder magazine”.
QSD, 30-4-1798.
9.
Corfield, “Walking the City Streets: The Urban Odyssey in
Eighteenth-Century England,” Journal of Urban History
16:2 (February 1990), 141-149.
11.
Phyllis Lambert, “Removing the Fortifications: toward a New
Urban Form,” in Lambert and Alan Stewart (eds.), Opening
the Gates of Eighteenth-Century Montréal (Montreal,
1992), 85.
12.
Fernand Ouellet refers to these socio-economic changes as “adverse
economic conjunctures” in his book, Economic and Social
History of Quebec, 1760-1850: Structures and Conjunctures
(Ottawa, 1980), 280.
14.
According to W.H. Parker, Montreal had developed beyond the old city
into seven suburbs located to the west, north and south. Parker,
“The Towns of Lower Canada in the 1830’s,” in R.P.
Beckinsale & J.N. Houston (eds,), Urbanization and Its
Problems (Oxford, 1970), 398.
15.
Alan Stewart, “Settlement, Commerce, and the Local Economy”
in Lambert and Stewart (eds.), Opening the Gates, 45-46.
17.
I am referring to Marie Millette, Marie Euphrosine Metthote, and
Marie Livernois’s brothel in the St. Mary suburb. (QSD,
31-8-1814)
19.
Court depositions offer a way of determining where women and men
kept brothels in the city. Nearly three-quarters of these documents
noted the street on which the brothel was situated; less than a
tenth of the total mentioned only the suburb. A street number was
rare. Sometimes the clerk of the court provided pertinent details in
the depositions such as the names of the intersecting streets if a
particular brothel was located on a street corner or some other
characteristic as in the case of a brothel which was described as
situated at the end of College Street.
20.
Since specific street numbers were not usually recorded in the legal
sources, I have represented the total number of brothel complaints
issued by prosecutors on corresponding city streets. Certainly this
depiction of brothels is problematic for a number of reasons. First,
we do not know anything about those brothels which existed but for
which no legal objection has been found. Second, we do not know if
certain houses were utilized repeatedly as brothels. Third, my
argument that brothels spread over the period based on my
representation of them on these maps is tentative at best. At the
very least I would posit that these maps tell us two things:
firstly, the legal grievances recorded in depositions reflected the
geographic location of the complainants; and secondly, policing
practises influenced the numbers of brothel-keeping complaints and
prosecutions. With the establishment of the watch system in the
suburbs in 1836 and 1837, and the re-organization of the Montreal
police in 1838, the number of complaints, which were increasingly
made by constables themselves, grew.
21.
These periods were chosen for a number of reasons which primarily
reflected changes in the policing practices of the city. Before 1830
a professional police office had been established which operated
daily out of the court house, with special police constables
attached to it. The police office, managed by two salaried
magistrates who also acted as chairmen of the Quarter Sessions, took
over much of the business of the clerk of the peace, where they were
to “receive depositions, issue summonses and warrants, and the
like”. Donald Fyson, “Criminal Justice, Civil Society
and the Local State: The Justices of the Peace in the District of
Montreal, 1764-1830,” (Ph.D., Université de Montréal,
1995, 73. Thus, the office of the clerk of the peace served a less
important position in the everyday business of city policing.
Rather, the clerk of the peace curtailed his activities, according
to Fyson, to the administration of the city and to the more serious
criminal cases handled by higher criminal courts. (Ibid., 75.) By
the end of the 1820s, the police office was under attack. The two
salaried magistrates, Thomas McCord and Jean-Marie Mondelet were
dismissed and replaced by a single magistrate, Samuel Gale. In 1829,
the Police Office was disbanded and the post of chairman of the
Quarter Sessions was abolished. The Police Office and its funding
was transferred to the Peace Office and thus became the
responsibility of the clerk of the peace. (Ibid., 79.) The “new”
system that was installed was an attempt to return to an older one
in which the justices were voluntary and non-salaried, operating out
of their homes. (Ibid., 80.) In addition, an internal reorganization
of the watch was made in 1832 and completely restructured by 1836,
with watchmen regularly patrolling the suburbs. Following the
Rebellions of 1837-1838 and under the recommendations of Lord
Durham, the police force was reorganized by an 1838 edict from the
Special Council which augmented the complement of constables and
designed changes in the method of patrolling.
24.
A group of 24 prominent men, the likes of Thomas Bagg and lawyer
Samuel Monk, petitioned an 1834 Grand Jury to rid their
neighbourhood of a house of ill repute which had been operating on
Vitré Street for ten years. Divided into two flats, both of
which were deemed brothels by the petitioners, the building was
owned by Mrs. Lemery and leased to women characterized as lewd and
disorderly. According to the authors of the petition, the brothels
disturbed the public peace by operating at all hours of the day and
night and by the assaults and riots that occurred there with
regularity. Moreover, residents and visitors publicly exhibited
obscene behaviour to the “great moral danger” of the
neighbours. The Grand Jury agreed with the petitioners that their
complaint merited immediate attention. QSD, 29-4-1834.
25.
In the city of St. Louis, police sweeps or raids yielded dozens of
prostitutes and a few clients at a time. Jeffrey Adler argues that
these raids were instituted for a number of different reasons: in
response to moral crusaders, to control the nonsexual activities,
such as larceny, which took place in certain brothels, to regulate
those brothels which became unusually disorderly, and to remind
madams of their implicit arrangement with city authorities.
(“Streetwalkers, Degraded Outcasts and Good-for-Nothing
Huzzies: Women and the Dangerous Class in Antebellum St. Louis”
Journal of Social History 25:4 (1992): 741-742)
34.
Elinor Senior acknowledges that the favourite haunts of soldiers
tended to be the grog shop and the brothel, yet argues that the
routine of barracks life curtailed their involvement in brothel
activities. Late-night passes for soldiers were, she suggests,
conservatively handed out or forbidden in times when tension existed
between the community and the military. Senior, British Regulars
in Montreal: An Imperial Garrison, 1832-1854 (Montreal, 1981),
149-151. However, court records clearly show that soldiers were
often caught in brothels after tattoo at 8 o’clock in the
evening. Either late passes were in reality easy to obtain or
unnecessary to leave the barracks. There is certainly a gap between
what was prescribed and what was practised. In Halifax, a port and
garrison town similar to Montreal, some merchants who catered to
soldiers and sailors competed with other establishments by offering
them an array of services from selling liquor and sex, to using
their daughters to lure customers. The availability of women
attracted customers for food and liquor or whatever else was
normally on sale and gave a marginal shop the edge over its equally
unstable neighbour without such extra services. Judith Fingard, The
Dark Side of Life in Victorian Halifax (Porters Lake, NS, 1989),
101.
37.
Some Montreal brothel-keepers referred to themselves as dressmakers
and seamstresses in 1831 when the census-taker knocked at their
doors.
39.
Marcia Carlisle, “Disorderly City, Disorderly Women:
Prostitution in Ante-Bellum Philadelphia,” Pennsylvania
Magazine of History and Biography 110:4 (1986), 554-556.
46.
McCord Archives, McCord Papers, vol. 692, QS, 18-1-1847. I thank
Brian Young for bringing this source to my attention and for
providing photocopies of some of the cases.
57.
I have not found any evidence of what it cost to buy a drink in a
Montreal brothel. Most of the depositions were simply too vague. Of
the ten depositions concerning the infraction of selling liquor
without a licence which I identified in the Special Sessions bundles
for the years 1841 and 1842, only three of them recorded the cost of
refreshments at unlicenced establishments. None of the individuals
charged were associated with prostitution. The first one involved
pastry cook and confectioner Susanna Smith. Apparently Arthur
Gilmore bought two glasses of wine at her house and paid 3 pence for
each (SSD, 8-11-1842). The second case implicated widow Josephte
Archambeault and Jean-Baptiste Morrin both innkeepers in Longue
Pointe who were charged with selling liquor without a licence after
another tavernkeeper, Pierre Monette, complained to the authorities.
He claimed to have drunk four glasses of rum at Archambeault’s
establishment with David Duford who paid 6 pence for the beverages
(SSD, 25-2-1841). The last case involved a trader by the name of
Petronelle Sabourin who sold Pierre Lafontaine a half glass of rum
for “5 sols” (SSD, 12-10-1842). Outside of legal
complaints, the only other reference that I have to the price of
alcoholic beverages is in travellers’ accounts. Thomas Fowler
wrote about the cost of purchasing drinks in the various taverns and
inns of the city:
The
cheapest which I saw sold, in the various places we visited, was
four pence per glass, and some as high as six pence. A glass of soda
water, lemonade, beer, and cider, is the fill of a small tumbler
containing about half an imperial pint; but a glass of spirits or
wine, is only the fill of a wine glass. Few kinds of spirits or wine
in this country exceed one penny per glass wholesale, and some kinds
not so much. However, in the ordinary taverns they generally charge
four pence a glass for any kind of liquor; but in the hotels they
charge six pence per glass, and for some particular kinds more.
61.
NAC, RG4 A 1, (“S” Series) Civil and Provincial
Secretary, Lower Canada, vol. 95, 7-7-1807. I would like to
thank Alan Stewart for bringing this letter to my attention.
77.
James S. Buckingham, Canada, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and the
other British Provinces in North America (London, 1843), 107.
79.
William Bell, Hints to emigrants: in a series of letters from
Upper Canada (Edinburgh, 1824), 47.
81.
Isaac Fidler, Observations on professions, literature, manners,
and emigration in the United States and Canada, made during a
residence there in 1832 (London, 1833), 141.
84.
William Henry Atherton, Montreal 1535-1914 Under British Rule
1760-1914, vol. 2 (Montreal, 1914), 131.
85.
Donald Fyson, “Eating in the City: Diet and Provisioning in
Early Nineteenth-Century Montreal” (M.A., McGill, 1989), 89.
89.
Judith Walkowitz, Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women,
class, and the state (London, 1980), 26.
90.
Barbara Meil Hobson, Uneasy Virtue: The Politics of Prostitution
and the American Reform Tradition (New York, 1987), 26.
98.
Petition by Widow Joseph Perrault, Journal of Lower Canada
House of Assembly, vol. 25 (21 February 1816), 298-302.
103.
It was customary in Victorian Halifax for police to arrest offenders
in the common land around the city where homeless people lived.
Judith Fingard reports that next to taverns, these common lands
account for the second highest level of arrests of all offenders
with respect to locality. The wharves, vessels, and markets came
next, followed by military installations. Fingard, Dark Side of
Life, 39-40.
112.
The police registers provide numerous instances whereby soldiers
showed little regard for civilian law. When Sub-constable Thomas
Dalhanty came to the rescue of a young woman being “illused”
by soldier Patrick Prindle, he was bayoneted in the thigh by
Prindle, who then ran to the guard gate where he was “admitted
and protected from arrest by the Sergeant of the Guard and all the
men under his command” (NAC, RG4 B 14, Police Records, vol.
64, 28-10-1841). Similarly, when a soldier of the 23rd Regiment drew
his bayonet on Sub-constable Bowen in Commissioners Street and told
him to go about his business, the sergeant on guard refused to give
Bowen the soldier’s name. For Sub-constables Dalhanty and
Bowen, these lawbreaking soldiers were beyond their reach.
117.
More than a thousand soldiers were quartered at the barracks every
year between 1839 and 1854. These men were for the most part single
or separated from their wives by virtue of the army regulations
placed upon their private lives. According to Elinor Senior, only 6%
of them were permitted army rations and barrack lodgings for their
families. Most could not afford to bring their families to Canada
and support them at their own expense. For those who wanted to
marry, permission had to be obtained from the captain of their
company who apparently inquired into the character of the woman
before passing their request for marriage on to the commanding
officer who had the final decision. Senior, British Regulars in
Montreal, 148-149. Many of those who did not marry, turned to
prostitutes for sex.
118.
Frances Finnegan’s study of York prostitutes shows that
unofficial provisions for visits by prostitutes to the barracks most
likely occurred although there is no evidence in military records.
However, there are numerous newspaper accounts of prostitutes found
in the company of soldiers. Finnegan, Poverty and Prostitution: A
Study of Victorian Prostitutes in York (New York, 1979), 26-27;
see also Walkowitz, Prostitution and Victorian Society.
Imágenes y representaciones mitológicas de la prostituta en la sociedad mexicana